Banks, savings and loans, microfinance institutions, fintechs, and insurers
Find out how AI is really used in your institution, and govern it before a regulator or incident forces the issue.
AI is already inside your institution. Staff use chat assistants to draft letters and summarise reports, vendors ship AI features in the software you already license, and your own teams are building models on customer data. The question from the board and the regulator is simple: who is in control of it?
The AI governance readiness review answers that question in three to four weeks. It gives you a clear picture of where AI is used, what could go wrong, and what to do about it, in a form your risk committee and board can act on.
The review uses the SAFER AI Risk Toolkit, a five-pillar framework (Safety, Accountability, Fairness, Explainability, Resilience) developed for governing AI inside a regulated commercial bank in Ghana, not adapted from a generic template.
Staff are already using AI tools, vendors are selling AI features, and boards are asking how any of it is controlled. Most institutions have no inventory, no policy, and no clear owner.
Format
Fixed scope and fixed fee, typically three to four weeks
Why me
Author of the SAFER AI Risk Toolkit, used to govern AI inside a regulated commercial bank.
Want to run the assessment yourselves? The toolkit is available on its own.
Buy the SAFER AI Risk ToolkitDescribe the problem in a few lines. I will tell you honestly whether I can help, and if not, who might.
